2 MINUTE SILENCE

The Royal British Legion

Image via Wikipedia

 

In aid of the Royal British Legion Poppy Appeal 2010.

this looks like the most wierd single ever released but also the most poignant and important.
please check it out, it’s a video and is completely silent but the video shows the important supporters of the cause.
Lets face it, this is about you handing over money so if you don’t want the video and silence that comes with it please just donate to the Poppy Appeal 2010.
thanks ;)
2 MINUTE SILENCE
£1.00
2 MINUTE SILENCE
Pre-order now to help get 2 MINUTE SILENCE to number 1 in the charts on Nov 14.
Funds will support serving & ex-serving troops and their families.

On the release date of Nov 8th, you will receive a link to download and keep the full 2 minute video.

Click the link below to get it.

http://www.silentsingle.com/Store/DII-46-5-2+minute+silence.html

 

Storm coming in

Hurricane Ivan just west of Grenada in the Car...

Image via Wikipedia

Just wanted to update you all on the massive storm coming into Trinidad & Tobago (and the rest of the Caribbean).

It has been upgraded to a Tropical Storm (#Tomas) and will make landfall in Trinidad as well as Grenada and the other Islands. It is expected to hit Jamaica in the form of a hurricane after the weekend.

Batten down the hatches and don’t panic.
Stock up now with food and light and be careful.

Stay away from the windows and make sure your pets are also safe. They are like small children in times like this.

See you next week.

 

Here is a list of Coproration shelters for those that need it.

Revised shelters listing with contact information. PDF for download.http://ow.ly/31LKk

New armour saves soldier’s life

Osprey body armour next to an L85A2 rifle. No ...

Image via Wikipedia

The reason I have posted this is to show how deaths and the subsequent examinations and investigations can help others. The situation is like a donor card… Help someone to live after my death…

And as part of that team learning those lessons it is an immensely proud moment when you do find out something has happened and a life has been saved.

Well done to the team… We did a good job…

“New armour saves soldier’s life”

A British soldier escaped death when he was hit by a Taliban bullet in Afghanistan because he was wearing the British forces‘ latest Osprey body armour, the Ministry of Defence has said.

Ranger Ryan Boyd, of 1st Battalion The Royal Irish Regiment, was knocked off his feet but not seriously injured when his unit came under attack while patrolling the Nad-e Ali district of Helmand province earlier this month.

The 26-year-old, from Bangor in Northern Ireland, survived being hit by a bullet because a side plate fitted to his armour, known as Osprey body armour, absorbed the force of the shot, the MoD said.

“Troops’ equipment is improving all the time and will continue to improve as new technology becomes available,” Lieutenant Colonel David Eastman, spokesman for Task Force Helmand, said.

“The latest improvements to Osprey body armour make a real difference to soldiers’ personal protection and this incident demonstrates what a lifesaver it can be.”

Reading this on your mobile device? Try The Evening Standard now by clicking http://ThisIsLondon.mwap.at.

Tony Blair ‘to be called back’ to Iraq war inquiry to answer questions about ‘gaps’ in his evidence

"Bliar" - Protest outside Blair's da...

Image by chrisjohnbeckett via Flickr

Every now and then you get some really good news.

Here is some I got today and I hope this time they really ask him what they should have last time…

HOW MUCH DID HE GET FROM THE OIL DEALS???

Originally by a Daily Mail Reporter

Tony Blair is to be recalled by the Chilcot inquiry into the Iraq War to answer new questions about ‘gaps’ in the evidence he gave earlier this year.

The former Prime Minister is likely to be asked to clarify the political build-up to the 2003 American-led invasion.

He is also expected to further explain the legality of Britain’s participation in the controversial war.
Tony Blair at the Chilcot inquiry

Giving evidence: Tony Blair at the Chilcot inquiry into the Iraq War in January. He is expected to be recalled to make a second appearance early in the new year

Sir John Chilcot will write to Mr Blair next month to ask him to attend a public hearing in early 2011, reported The Times.

During his six-hour testimony earlier this year, Mr Blair mounted a vigorous defence of the invasion and insisted he had no regrets over removing Saddam Hussein.

He denied he took the country to war on the basis of a ‘lie’ over the dictator’s supposed weapons of mass destruction.

At the end of his session one member of the audience shouted: ‘What, no regrets? Come on’ while others heckled ‘You are a liar’, ‘And a murderer’.

Sir John has previously explained that as his team pores through thousands of secret government documents relating to the Iraq invasion, should they find ‘conflicts or gaps within the evidence’ then they will recall witnesses.

Liam Fox, the current Defence Secretary, asked Sir John to recall Gordon Brown to the inquiry earlier this year after he was forced into an humiliating admission that he had slashed defence spending while British troops were at war in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The then-PM told MPs he had been wrong to tell the inquiry that defence spending under Labour was ‘rising in real terms every year’.

In January, an unrepentant Mr Blair was heckled and jeered by families of Britain’s war dead as he declared he had ‘not a regret’ about invading Iraq.

He made it clear he would do the same again and warned world leaders they may soon have to take similar decisions over Iran.

Despite the deaths of up to 700,000 Iraqis and 179 British troops, Mr Blair said he felt ‘responsibility but not a regret’ at the end of his six hours of evidence. There was no hint of remorse.

Saddam had been a ‘monster’ and it had been right to remove him even to prevent the ‘possibility’ that he could acquire weapons of mass destruction, Mr Blair said.

He warned that Iran’s nuclear weapons programme now poses an even greater threat.

The Original Article is here

Nuclear sub on the rocks: Navy’s brand-new £1 billion attack boat runs aground

HMS Astute

Image by Màrtainn via Flickr

“Nuclear sub on the rocks: Navy’s brand-new £1 billion attack boat runs aground”

The Royal Navy’s newest and largest attack submarine ran aground today during routine sea trials.

The £1 billion HMS Astute — designed to be virtually “invisible” to enemies —has become a tourist attraction on the Isle of Skye. Residents said the 97 metre-long nuclear-powered submarine, the length of 10 London double-decker buses, was stuck on rocks near Skye Bridge.

A spokesman for the Ministry of Defence said the boat was watertight and there was no nuclear risk but admitted it was in difficulties.

Helen Birch of the International Otter Survival Fund at Broadford on Skye said: “I didn’t expect to see a submarine out of our window. It was quite a surprise. I expect it will become a bit of a tourist attraction while it’s stuck here.”

The MoD spokesman said: “We are aware of an incident involving one of our submarines off the Isle of Skye. This is not a nuclear incident.

“We are responding and can confirm that there are no injuries to personnel and the submarine remains watertight. There is no indication of any environmental impact.”

The 7,800-tonne Astute is the Royal Navy’s newest and largest attack submarine and her naming ceremony was conducted by the Duchess of Cornwall, who is patron of the boat.

The Maritime and Coastguard Agency said it was alerted at about 0819. A spokesman said they were monitoring the situation.

Astute is one of three fleet submarines built at a cost of £3.5 billion and boasts a radical new autopilot.

Speaking to the BBC last month, Astute’s commanding officer, Commander Andy Coles, said: “We have a brand new method of controlling the submarine, which is by platform management system, rather than the old conventional way of doing everything of using your hands.

“This is all fly-by-wire technology including only an autopilot rather than a steering column.” Her nuclear reactor does not need to be refuelled during the boat’s 25-year service. Since the submarine can purify water and air, she can circumnavigate the planet without resurfacing.

She is the first submarine built in the UK since HMS Vengeance in 1998.

On November 20 2009, Astute arrived at her home port at Faslane and on 16 February she left there for sea trials and dived for the first time two days later.

It is not the first incident involving a nuclear submarine off Scotland. In 2001, HMS Triumph was grounded off the Scottish coast while under the command of trainee officers — fortunately, she suffered only superficial damage.

The Royal Navy said Triumph made “a glancing contact with soft sand and shells” when submerged.

Submarine HMS Trafalgar also sustained millions of pounds of damage when she ran aground off Skye in 2002. Two senior officers were reprimanded over the incident after admitting negligence.

96 metres long and almost silent

* Launched on June 8, 2007, she can make drinking water and oxygen from sea water so she can circumnavigate the planet without resurfacing.

* Her 96m hull is coated with 39,000 rubber tiles which make her virtually impossible for an enemy to hear

* She makes less noise than a baby dolphin and has silent flush lavatories.

* Astute’s listening systems are so sophisticated she can detect the QE2 leaving New York from the Channel.

* She can carry 38 Spearfish heavyweight torpedoes and Tomahawk land attack cruise missiles, which can pinpoint targets in North Africa from Portsmouth.

* She can travel at more than 20 knots.

* Five chefs serve 98 crew 18,000 sausages and 4,200 Weetabix for breakfast on a 10-week patrol.

News

Reading this on your mobile device? Try The Evening Standard now by clicking http://ThisIsLondon.mwap.at.

If you love dead bodies, you will love this!

Image by Mikey Swales...Polytunnel related tales via Flickr

The Kidnap of the Teddy didn't play out how Mickey wanted...

They speak after death…

Corpse-measuring method gets new life
1 September 2010

 

Dr Sipho Mfolozi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Crime science: Dr Sipho Mfolozi is the inventor of the prize-winning NecroChronometer.

A new device set to revolutionise how forensic pathologists measure a body’s time of death at crime scenes is the brainchild of Dr Sipho Mfolozi of UCT‘s Division of Forensic Medicine.

The imaginatively named NecroChronometer – still in its alpha stage of development – took second place at the National Innovation Competition, an event held every two years by the Technology Innovation Agency and the Department of Science and Technology.

According to the competition’s rules, the R200 000 cash prize will be divided between research funding and commercialising the device once complete.

Mfolozi explains that the NecroChronometer uses three tried-and-tested methods to calculate time of death, namely tympanic mambrane (in the ear) temperature, liver temperature and the concentration of potassium in the corpse‘s eye fluid. But the NecroChronometer’s claim to innovation is that it combines all three methods, as well as factoring in climate and weather variables, such as wind speed and humidity, which affect the cooling rate of the corpse.

Looking like something out of a 1960s Star Trek episode, the NecroChronometer comprises three probes and a retro-futuristic handheld reader, which includes an anemometer for reading wind speed and a hygrometer for air humidity.

“It’s only a static model, so it’s still a bit more bulky than I would like,” says Mfolozi.

Despite its appearance, the working model will be at one with technology. Bluetooth will wirelessly transmit data from the corpse’s probes to the handheld device, and the NecroChronometer will be able to connect to the internet from anywhere on the planet to download weather history for the area.

“The plan is to combine all these factors to give the most accurate reading possible,” says Mfolozi proudly.

But although with a patent pending. the device is yet to be tested. Mfolozi is confident that this next stage in the birthing of the NecroChronometer will be successful.

“There’s nothing magical about it,” he says modestly. “It’s just science.”

Here is the original article.

Forensic Artistry – Design in the Crime…

Skulls on a Beach: "Currents carry many d...

Image via Wikipedia

OK here is a newer forensic field which you may not of heard about before.

Forensic Artistry – Using skills as an artist to re-create the features of a person or to enhance images to show that person older than what the original image shows…

Confused?

Try this………

 

Age progressions….

That’s all I could think of when I saw these pictures I’m about to point you to.  Imagine you are asked to do an age progession, and they only want to add 2-3 years to the person (usually we’re talking a fugitive age progressionhere.)  Age progressing a kid a couple years is one thing, there are definite changes depending on what age you are starting from.  But in an adult? Not much to do, unless you have  a great lead or something…maybe massive weight gain or loss,  they know somebody got a nosejob  (not likely, but still….) or changed their hair, or grew a beard. So imagine you got sent this picture, and you were told you age progress her 3 years. What would you do?
Courtesy: Multnomah County Sheriff, Ore.

I might add a tiny bit of gray, a tiny bit of sagging around the eyes, soften the jawline a smidge. After all, it’s only 3 years, right?  And then they bring her in and she looks like this:

Courtesy: Multnomah County Sheriff, Ore.

WHOA. This is the effect that methamphetamines have on a person. And this is something all forensic artists need to keep in mind when they are age-progressing a fugitive. After all, you start with a picture of a fresh-faced kid at 18, it’s hard to image them as a 30 year old that looks more like 60. But it can happen if drugs, and especially meth, is involved. I think when age progressing someone, unless you know they are an art dealer that has absconded to Bermuda with a stolen Picasso, or some kind of software tycoon, keep in the back of your mind you might need to make them look worse than their years. Of course, you need to go on what the officer is telling you that he knows about the person. If someone is a health nut (and yes, some fugitives are) then they would most likely not turn to drugs. The officer or agent requesting the age-progression will know more about this person than you, so listen to what they have to say. And if your bad guy is on the run,  already has a history with other drug use…..well, it’s something to keep in the back of your head. I know I’m going to pay more attention to this from now on.

To see the entire photo gallery (and prepare to be shocked) go to  ”The Faces of Meth: Before and After.”

Age Progression

How age progressions work

I won’t attempt to explain all the science behind the human brain, which neurons are firing in which lobe when we are able to recognize someone when even years or decades have passed.  I’m sure there is some research and study on that, and I’d be happy to link to it in the future. But that’s not the point right now….

What I do know is that I was watching “The Pacific” the other night, and there was one early scene where a doctor is examining a patient, a young man, and I was looking at his face, thinking “Where do I know him? Where have I seen him?“  Just a few seconds passed, and it popped in my head: “the kid from Jurassic Park.”

And guess what, that’s exactly who it was. I recognized someone that was a child actor in a movie 17 years ago. It turns out his name is Joseph Mazzello (I had to go to IMDB to find that out….sorry, Joseph):

Photo courtesy www.imdb.com

 

…and he grew up from this little boy here in Jurassic Park:

Photo courtesy www.imdb.com

Jurassic Park  came out in 1993, and I’ve probably seen it a couple times since then, but still….17 years?? I can honestly say that I haven’t seen him in any of the other shows listed…he was in one episode of CSI, but apparently I didn’t see that one.   I just think it’s an amazing thing that humans can recognize someone from that long ago. We have incredible recognition capabilities. Years and even decades can pass, and still, it works. So what was it? It was mostly his eyes that caught me, and his mouth. Given that his facial proportions changed wildly over those years (and proportion is one of the key factors in facial recognition) makes that all the more amazing to me.

Which gives all forensic artists a shot in the arm, because we work on age progressions of fugitives where we may be adding a good 30 years to them. And sometimes we wonder, “Is this going to be any help at all?” Yes, it sure could.

Or, consider the excellent artists at the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), this is the type of work they do, day in and day out (go click that link and see some of the amazing work they do). They do it with an impressive success rate as well. They’ve taken photos of children, age progressed them by any number of years, and the child was found looking startling similar to the artist’s conception.

Which makes all forensic artists look good. Thanks, NCMEC.

****ALERT!!*** Boy, talk about great timing! I wrote this post days ago, posted it hours ago, and now just saw that practically seconds ago, Joe Mullins posted a news story on his“Forensic Art Talk” page about NCMEC, featuring forensic artist Steve Loftin. Steve did some incredible age progression work  on two missing little girls, the Lyon sisters, who would be in their 40′s now. NCMEC keeps these cases open until they know what happened. That’s just remarkable, and inspiring. So, please, check out this news story HERE.

 

“I’m in high school and want to be a Forensic Artist. What should I do?”

At this point…stay out of trouble. Seriously, at this part of your life, the most important thing you can do, more important than any art or science class you can take, is to stay out of trouble. And by that I mean, drugs, alcohol, anything that could lead to a police record.

The fact is that most forensic artists work in Law Enforcement (LE); most do composite sketches or facial reconstructions as part of their work in an agency. They could be a detective, a patrol officer, crime scene tech, whatever. But they have a steady, full-time job in LE, and do the forensic art in addition to that. And getting a job in LE when you have a police record, or have shown a pattern of bad behavior is going to make things tougher on you. Maybe not impossible, but still, tougher than it needs to be.

If you’re a good kid and intend on staying that way, then consider what type of full-time job you would want to have in LE, and work towards that. Of course, take some art classes, and work on your drawing skills too. But being a part of LE is the most necessary step to getting work as a forensic artist. Get your foot in the door there, and then the opportunities to being a forensic artist can open up. You’ll still have to work at that part though, by getting forensic art training, talking to your supervisors and letting them know how sending you out on a composite sketch could help a case. But you’ll be where the work is.

So how do you go about gettting a job in LE? I just found a very helpful website called Discover Policing that can probably give you all the information you will need.

 

Q: I am interested in a career doing facial reconstruction. It seems that all the jobs go to those in law enforcement. I really want to help victims and families, so where do I start?

A: This is the short answer…and I promise to write several blog posts in the coming days outlining it more:

1) Possess art talent: If you don’t have any innate skill in drawing and sculpting, then you will be at a severe disadvantage. Don’t spend your money taking a forensic art or facial reconstruction class… yet.

2) Research to see how many unidentified victims (UIDs) are in your city/state: A couple sites to check out are www.doenetwork.org and www.identifyus.org. If there aren’t many, there is likely not much need for your services (so you may have to move if really want to pursue this). But if there are:

3) Become employed by a law enforcement (LE) agency or medical examiner’s (ME) office in some capacity.
This is because a skull is evidence, and part of a LE investigation, and they will NOT hand it over to anyone that is not an employee of an agency.  There are a handful of artists that are the exception to this rule, and trust me, they have earned that spot. If you’re just starting out in the  field, the skulls won’t be going to you.

4) Learn the inner workings of the agency: If you took a facial reconstruction class, would they let you do a facial reconstruction? This is where you might hit a brick wall: *Not every agency or medical examiner believes in facial reconstruction so they may give an emphatic NO!*And they’ll likely stick to their guns.

Many artists already in LE have run into this, and they will never do a facial recon unless they move somewhere else, or the people that said “no” move somewhere else, or retire.

5) If they say YES, take several facial reconstruction classes: One 1-week class is generally not enough to do this work and do it justice (check my training page.) There’s no sense in spending hundreds or thousands of dollars taking classes before you know whether the agency will let you do one. Plus, you will probably have to pay out of your own pocket. Every artist I know has had to pay for their own classes at some point…another reality of the field.

6) If they say NO: you will probably have to move to find an agency that will allow you to do facial reconstruction.

This is why it is so hard to get into forensic art: The work is in law enforcement. You generally need to join first, then dig in your heels from there.

And..even then, you will have do it as a sideline to your regular job in LE. There are probably less than 50 full-time forensic atists out there, and they do all facets of the work (composites, age progressions, etc), not just facial reconstruction. I can’t think of anyone that does facial reconstruction as a full-time paying career, 40 hours a week. That  job just simply doesn’t exist.

I would STRONGLY advise anyone reading this to NOT attempt to volunteer in this capacity! Facial reconstructions are the victim’s last chance to be identified; this work should only be done by highly trained people working within a team of anthropologists and other LE professionals.

This is another requirement of forensic artists: let go of your ego and desires. They don’t matter.

Only the victims matter in this line of work.  If any artist forgets that, they are doing a disservice to the victims, and to the field as a whole.

Here is the site all this came from. Its a great site.

http://www.askaforensicartist.com/

Soldier earns Military Cross with three acts of ‘astonishing’ heroism

Coldstream Guards slow march

Image via Wikipedia

“Soldier earns Military Cross with three acts of ‘astonishing’ heroism”

A soldier has been awarded the Military Cross for three “astonishing” acts of bravery when he put himself in the line of fire to allow colleagues to reach safety in Afghanistan.

Lance Corporal Marc Reader, 23, from Brentwood, said today that the medal – awarded for “continuous gallantry and selfless commitment” – was “a nice surprise”.

The former bricklayer joined the Army in 2005 and is a member of 1st Battalion, The Coldstream Guards.

In the first incident, a soldier in his reconnaissance unit became pinned down by fire when their squad came under attack from the Taliban.

L/Cpl Reader drew the enemy’s fire by putting himself in their sights, thereby allowing his colleague to reach cover. His return fire was so accurate that the insurgents stopped shooting and ran away. On a second patrol, his team was again ambushed, leading to the unit commander asking for volunteers for an outflanking manoeuvre.

L/Cpl Reader and a colleague charged the Taliban positions, forcing them to flee. His third act of heroism came when his squad was pinned down near a minefield by Taliban fighters firing from three different directions.

L/Cpl Reader raced down a ditch and, after allowing himself to be visible to Taliban guns, immediately returned fire. His fellow soldiers were able to reach safety.

He said: “The medal was a nice surprise, but I feel like I just did my job and what was expected of me. We took the fight to the enemy and won, which felt good.”

L/Cpl Reader is engaged to a chef who is with the Royal Logistic Corps and is attached to his battalion.

A Ministry of Defence spokeswoman said: “L/Cpl Readers’ continuous gallantry, personal example and offensive spirit in the face of fierce enemy attacks have been exemplary throughout the tour.

“He has stepped into ambush killing areas, stormed insurgent firing positions and exposed himself to draw fire away from his comrades. He has consistently placed himself in grave danger to protect his comrades with scant regard for his own safety.

“His gallantry and selfless commitment have been astonishing.”

Reading this on your mobile device? Try The Evening Standard now by clicking http://ThisIsLondon.mwap.at.

UPDATED: Murder Charges laid, accused named – Barbados

Two Barbadians arrested in mass murder fire.

Jamar Dewayne Orlando Bynoe, 19, Headley’s Land, Bank Hall (left)

Renaldo Anderson Alleyne, 21, Prescod Bottom, Hindsbury Road. (right)

Both young men are charged with the Murder of six young women at Campus Trendz, wounding with intent and arson in relation to the same happening.(Photos of accused courtesy of Barbados Today unless we hear from them otherwise)

Also charged with earlier petrol bombing of Chicken Galore

Bynoe and Alleyne are charged with aggravated burglary and arson at Chicken Galore at Bank Hall, St Michael, on August 13, 2010 three weeks before the September 3rd Campus Trendz murders.

Here is our original story published September 11, 2010 at 11:33pm Bridgetown time…

Barbados is still a small island with no place to run

Reports on radio and on the website of The Nation indicate that two men from Barbados are “assisting the police with their investigations” as of Saturday afternoon.

If we had to lay a bet on how this came about, we’d say that someone knew something and made a phone call that broke the case. A name, often given anonymously, is all it takes. That’s just our speculation at this point, but as we’ve said before, Barbados is a small island and smaller still if a normal criminal* is on the run after committing a horrific crime. That’s one of the things that helps to make this island relatively safe and much safer than many other countries.

If the two under arrest are the ones who robbed, chopped and then set the Campus Trendz shop on fire, their capture is some small comfort to the families of the six victims and the community – but really just one of the many steps that should happen in the coming months and years.

That’s “many steps that should happen”, but you know how it is here and so do we.

Our predictions for the Campus Trendz murder case…

The first concern now is the fear and hope by every rational person in Barbados that our under-funded, under-trained, under-staffed and less-than-professional police force won’t blow the case (or haven’t already) through mishandling of evidence, lack of professional resources or knowledge – or even (Lord help us) amateurish Keystone Cops actions. That’s always a worry.

“There will be no real inquiry into the other factors that set the stage for six young women to burn to death in the rear of what should have been a safe workplace.”

The next concern is that the public will never be told the truth about the many factors that led to the deaths of our relatives, friends and neighbours. There will be a “sub-justice” clamp on any real facts by the news media so as not to taint the criminal trial of the two accused and that is understandable and normal to an extent.

Sadly though, what is also “normal” (as most thinking Barbadians know) is that after the trial and sentencing, there will be no real inquiry into the other factors that set the stage for six young women to burn to death in the rear of what should have been a safe workplace.

Time works in favour of those who want a nice quiet resolution that focuses entirely on the evil actions of two “youths” as they will probably be called in the press to prepare the public for a soft approach. Remember that only a few months ago the Barbados Advocate called the 25 year old career criminal who murdered Canadian tourist Teresa “Terry” Schwarzfeld a “youth” to prepare us for a plea bargain? (See Murderous 25 year old career criminal described as “Youth”)

There will be lots of political posturing and promises (there already have been), but in three or four years no changes will have taken place.  The victims will have died for nothing and the factors that resulted in their deaths will remain – waiting for the next confluence of circumstance to cause more preventable deaths.

Remember the Arch Cot cave-in deaths of a whole family as they slept over three years ago? Remember the promises for changes, implementation and enforcement of a building code, mapping of caves and full answers about who was responsible and how the deaths happened? Remember all that?

So here’s our predictions for the Campus Trendz robbery and murders of six young women.

1/ Charges laid – probably murder, maybe manslaughter but we’re betting murder for at least one of the accused, based upon turning one against the other if they didn’t both throw petrol bombs.

2/ No trial. After a couple of years, a plea bargain down to Manslaughter, backed up by a public relations campaign by the Director of Public Prosecutions and the Attorney General about why the decision was made etc. Easier for the government to handle the fallout years later than to have a public trial where the authorities lose control.

During a trial the defense lawyers will undoubtedly claim that the accused didn’t mean to kill anyone but set the fire to prevent someone following them – thinking that the girls would make it out the back fire exit. That would raise many of the issues that people want to see raised at an inquest and the authorities don’t want that. Bad for them, bad for the country’s tourism business where so much is based upon image and not reality. Same anywhere, really.

3/ Public Inquest? Not a chance. Not going to happen. No way.

The most common response and ‘solution’ to incidents of mass death in Barbados – whether caused by crime, neglect or lack of proper standards – continues to be political promises for future change made to a population that is conditioned to expect and accept low standards and low performance.

Notes

* Our reference to a “normal criminal” being easy to catch on this island is in contrast to, for instance, a criminal who conducts a professional assassination such as the murder of retired Barbados Immigration Chief and former Assistant Superintendent of Police Kenrick Hutson at his home. That crime remains unsolved.

Photo credit – The Nation: Two suspects nabbed in Tudor Street blaze

Original Story - http://barbadosfreepress.wordpress.com/2010/09/12/two-barbadians-arrested-in-mass-murder-fire/

Seven Crime Scene Fundamentals

 

Rigoberto Alpizar crime scene photo

Image via Wikipedia

 

By Lieutenant Raymond E. Foster, LAPD (ret.)

Crime scene protection is one of the basic, yet critical aspects, of field police work. Good crime scene practices enhance criminal investigations and, ultimately prosecutions. In this article, we explore seven aspects of crime scene protection that will improve your skills.

What is a crime scene?

If you ask most law enforcement professionals, they will likely tell you a crime scene is a location in which a crime occurred. This is an inadequate description. A crime scene is any location, person or thing wherein evidence of a crime may exist. Suppose you respond to a body dump. You have a homicide victim who has been dumped along the side of the road. Based on the investigation it is determined that the individual was murdered elsewhere. So, you have at least four crime scenes: the dump location, the murder location; the vehicle used to transport the victim; and, the victim’s body.

Later during your investigation you identify a offender and your investigation leads you to prepare a search warrant for his home. You know the murder occurred at a warehouse and not the offender’s home, however. If you prepare a search warrant, you will be searching for evidence that would tend to incriminate the offender. However, if the murder didn’t occur in the offender’s home, the offender and the offender’s house might still contain evidence of the crime of murder and therefore they are crime scenes. All of these particular crime scenes – body dump location, vehicle, murder scene, the victim’s body and offender’s home should have the same level of crime scene protection.

The concept that a crime scene is any location wherein evidence of a crime may exist impacts nearly every action a patrol officer takes. Consider that a traffic stop that develops into a felony arrest means the violator’s car (and the violator) may be crime scenes. Your next domestic violence call may be a crime scene, also.

Field Tactics at a Crime Scene

Field tactics are those defensive and offensive strategies, devices and procedures that increase police officer, citizen and offender safety. Field tactics always trump crime scene protection. One paramount and sometimes overlooked field tactic is a thorough search for the offender at the crime scene before crime scene protocols are initiated. If there is a victim down inside a location, the rescue and immediate medical care of that individual is more important than the crime scene. Another example would be the service of the search warrant at a murder suspect’s home. The evidence is not worth anyone’s safety.

Once you put up the yellow tape, follow-on personnel assume the scene has been cleared for the offender. I responded to crime scene where homicide detectives where cataloguing evidence hours after the initial call and they were surprised, and overpowered by the suspect who had secreted himself in a kitchen cabinet. As a first responder, it is your job to balance the protection of all personnel against the need to initiate good crime scene protocols.

The Theory of Transfer

In the late 19th Century, Dr. Edmund Locard, was one of the first criminalists. Locard, a French physician, developed the Theory of Transfer which is also referred to as the Exchange Principle. In essence, Locard said that whenever two objects come into contact with one another, they each leave and take something. There is always evidence of the exchange. Locard’s theory is the foundation of all good crime scene protocols.

Think of a traffic collision. How often have you noticed paint transfer on each of the vehicles involved? The paint transfer is an example of Locard’s theory – each vehicle has left something of itself on the other vehicle. At a crime scene we are locating, documenting and recovering evidence of a transfer between the offender and the location. Offenders leave something of themselves at the crime scene: fingerprints; DNA; footprints; etc. The offender also takes something from the crime scene: fibers; soil; DNA; etc.

Seven Crime Scene Fundamentals

Crime Scene Protection

One of the reasons we put up the yellow tape and deny entrance to crime scenes is Locard’s theory. Each person who enters a crime scene – paramedics, first responders, detectives and other personnel – leave something of themselves and take something from the crime scene. No matter how careful someone is, if they enter a crime scene, Locard’s Theory says they contaminate it.

We minimize contamination in three ways: denial of entrance; use of protective gear (gloves and booties as an example); and, by the use of a crime scene log. The first two are probably obvious. If you don’t go in the crime scene, you can’t contaminate it. If you do go in, and you wear the proper protective equipment you are less likely to leave something of yourself, such as fingerprints, at the crime scene. The third method, a crime scene log, helps us eliminate evidence later. If you find Sergeant Smith’s fingerprints at the crime scene it is much more likely he left them there during the investigation than during the crime itself. His fingerprint can likely be eliminated because our crime scene log tells us he was there.

Perimeters

Putting up crime scene tape and denying entrance is a minimum best practice. We can improve our crime scene protection protocols by examining incident control under different circumstances. As an example, in the field of critical incident management there is the concept of a three stage perimeter around hazardous materials spill. The three stages are the Hot Zone, the Inner Perimeter and the Outer Perimeter. Generally, a crime scene has a hot zone and an outer perimeter.

For crime scenes and critical incidents, it is always better to have been initially too big than too small. For crime scenes, the Hot Zone is those locations in which you initially suspect you will find evidence. At a homicide, scene you might secure the house, the yards, the houses on either side, and the street in front. For the Hot Zone, entry is denied to everyone who doesn’t not have direct and specific crime scene duties.

For the Outer Perimeter, entry is denied to all persons who do not have an official duty directly connected to the incident. The press, the neighbors, police officers from another jurisdiction and even a city councilperson should be denied entry. There are two basic reasons for this: If we have to expand the Hot Zone we have minimized some of the damage; And, personnel working between the outer perimeter and the Hot Zone don’t have to contend with distractions, etc.

But He’s the Boss

Typically, the most junior person is assign to the crime scene log and by default given the keys to protecting the Hot Zone. When the captain arrives and signs in, the rookie officer with the log will probably approach the Captain and record her information, but is unlikely to ask her not to enter the hot zone.

The inherent problems with having junior and often younger personnel guard sensitive areas is not only a problem at crime scenes. In Iraq, on a U.S. Military base, there is a military intelligence unit. Entrance to the military intelligence unit is restricted to those persons who have special passes and a Right to Know as well as a Need to Know the information contained therein. At first, regular US Army soldiers were assigned to guard the entrance to the unit, inspect passes and deny entrance. However, mid and high ranking US Military officers caused a problem. They would enter the location without the proper credentials simply because the lowest ranking person (typically a PFC or below) was reticent about telling a Colonel “No, you can’t enter.” The US Military solved the problem by delegating the guarding of the unit to foreign (not Iraqi) soldiers. The PFC from a foreign military wasn’t as impressed by Oakleafs, Eagles and Stars.

This point about crime scenes is for leaders. If you don’t have direct line supervision over a function within a Hot Zone you have no need to enter it. If you are a supervising criminalist you may want to go in and observe that proper evidence collection protocols are being followed. If you are the supervising detective, you probably should ensure your detectives are conducting a through investigation. But, if you are the watch commander, the divisional captain or the chief of police, you probably don’t have functional supervision over the personnel in the Hot Zone and should stay out.

Supervision, management and command staff should know when to and when not to enter a Hot Zone. Since you can’t hire foreign troops to guard your scene, there are a few things you can do to minimize potential contamination. First, place the log officer at the entry point to the outer perimeter. This way the person who can be within the outer perimeter but probably should enter the Hot Zone will feel like they obtained entry to something. Second, at the entrance to the Hot Zone place a more senior person whose first question to a would-be crime scene entrant should be, “Did you log in?” The second statement from this officer should be something like “This is a Hot Zone allow me to get someone to escort you in.” This should help communicate to the person attempting to enter the Hot Zone that they should think twice. It also gives the officer guarding the Hot Zone the opportunity to get a senior person and have that person take responsibility for the crime scene’s integrity.

The Golden Hour

The final concept is the Golden Hour. The Golden Hour concept comes from our British Police cousins. In essence, British homicide investigators are taught that the first few hours of an investigation are crucial. From the offender still being on the run to witnesses’ recollections being freshest, the earlier you can discover and follow up on a clue the better. Solid crime scene protocols are part of the Golden Hour concept. The better you protect a crime scene and follow basic protocols, the better enabled your investigators are to follow-up, run down and catch the offender. First responders often set the stage for the final outcome.

About the Author Lieutenant Raymond E. Foster, LAPD (ret.) retired from the Los Angeles Police Department. He is the author or co-author of six books including Police Technology and Leadership: Texas Hold ‘em Style. He can be contacted through his website at www.police-lieutenant.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 878 other followers